“A gracefully done world premiere. Elisabeth Gray is elegantly alluring as Anne…Jonathan Bank's direction leans towards the darker side of Anne and Stephen's marital issues. There's a good deal of humor and wit throughout the evening, for sure, but Bank seems to be downplaying frivolity in favor of the emotions that may have inspired Malleson to write the play…This isn't a flaw, but rather an interesting turn in a finely acted production of an intriguing play." Full Review
"A refined, rueful and often shrewd comedy about polyamory, written decades before open relationships were quite so openly discussed...Under the polished direction of Bank, its arguments remain provocative, while its structure feels familiar, its tone decorous...It is often very funny; it is also very nearly a tragedy...What is extraordinary about Malleson is his ability to create characters who are capable of feeling several things at once, or who don’t really know what they’re feeling at all." Full Review
"I won't say that 'Yours Unfaithfully' is the most consequential work that the Mint has unearthed from its vault of lost works—it is little too earnest, perhaps, its ironies a little too carefully polished—but there are many compensations in the author's unfailing elegance of expression…Under the super-smooth direction of Jonathan Bank, a quintet of actors, all equipped with a fine grasp of period style, make the most of Malleson's astringent portrait of an open marriage." Full Review
"'Yours Unfaithfully' is a definite find…What happens as the final curtain approaches in Malleson’s acerbic comedy will not be revealed, but it’s absolutely perfect...If Malleson wasn’t the exactly right man for his time, he may still be a man for 2017. He’s astute at understanding the complications that arise when men and women blithely place themselves above bourgeois attitudes…To bring this portrait of an alternate design for living to pungent life, Bank couldn’t have found a better cast." Full Review
"A delightful look at marriage and fidelity...Bank's staging is delectable as he keeps this drawing-room comedy moving at a clip. The cast is exquisite with just the right amount of everything...Malleson has a way with words and his outlook on sex, infidelity and open marriage is just as relevant today...In a time when the world seems out of control, it was nice to be captivated and slip into another time and place. Make sure you catch this sublime endeavor." Full Review
"Though open marriage continues to have its yea and naysayers, it's all a tad passé given the many current departures from traditional man-woman monogamous relationships. Nevertheless it does all add up to an engaging two hours thanks to the often witty dialogue and the generally fine performances Mr. Bank has elicited from the actors...By introducing us to Miles Malleson with this never produced play, Jonathan Bank proves the validity of that old saw 'better late than never.'" Full Review
"For all its 'shocking' stance, 'Yours Unfaithfully' is a fairly conventional play...The introduction of a conventional moral compass is actually the new concept that the playwright brings in as he tweaks the amoral social comedy employed by Wilde and Shaw...It doesn't entirely leave the realm of the lightweight, but it adds some gravitas to the proceedings...The acting, under Bank's direction, is of the high quality we've come to expect from the Mint...Another winner for the Mint." Full Review
"This never produced 1933 play is extremely well written, psychologically astute, often wry and–despite what initially appears preposterous–in context, rather credible. Playwright Miles Malleson had a terrific feel for represented class and period…Lightly presenting a provocative premise, the piece is entertaining and well mounted...Director Jonathan Bank keeps the three act piece humming along, allowing for awkward pauses with finesse." Full Review
"I really enjoyed ‘Yours Unfaithfully,’ so much so that I almost truly loved it. When a play is well-written, a great deal of the work that confronts an ensemble is already done…Malleson’s script advances the story well and with wit, but only after a rather lengthy exposition scene...I heard words that indicated all these characters have quite a bit of affection for one another, but I would have gladly indulged reasons why expressed in stolen non-verbal queues such as lingering looks." Full Review
"The staging by director Jonathan Bank and the acting by the cast of five convey an air of sophistication to the plot and discourse...The intelligent conversation written by Malleson is perfectly captured as the cast members do justice to it under Bank’s direction that highlights the outward sincerity but underlying angst. Banks and his cast play it straight, not reaching for laughs, but letting the seriousness itself communicate amusement at the complications created." Full Review
"Surprisingly contemporary for a play written more than 80 years ago, and this production is totally engaging…A series of beautifully orchestrated silent scenes speak just as loudly as Malleson's well-crafted dialogue. It's all executed by an excellent cast…Not everything works...There's far too much talk about cricket...Theatergoers who like tidy endings may balk at Malleson's ambiguous one. But those of a more open-minded disposition will find it gives them a lot to think about." Full Review
“Malleson’s delicious, cryptic work was light years ahead of its time, and this sumptuously crafted production is a treasure...Malleson’s characterization of Anne is profound…'Yours Unfaithfully' is a marvelous production exquisite in its dramatic spectacle and in the cast’s acute, humorous performances. This is a must-see for its subtleties of wit and humor, its sometimes brilliant dialogue, its fine recreation of setting, and its intriguing character portrayals.” Full Review
"The play is more sex positive and forward thinking than anything to come out in the last decade...Even if 'Yours Unfaithfully' isn’t 'contributing' anything new to the form, or saying anything 'important,' its very existence is a political statement that proclaims only we should be allowed to decide what to do with our bodies and how to fulfill our pleasure...The Mint Theater company has put together a remarkable production anchored by Gray and Von Essen." Full Review
"'Yours Unfaithfully' was written in 1933 but never produced, so we salute Jonathan Bank for staging the world premiere of this absolutely delightful comedy...Malleson’s ear for the language of the upper midle class in England is impeccable...This is exactly the sort of play that Jonathan Bank and his colleagues at the Mint are mandated to do. I’ve seen many of them, and this particular one is to me the jewel in its crown." Full Review
"I never thought that a previously unproduced play written the year I was born by someone whose name I’d never heard would still be so emotionally and intellectually riveting and relevant four score and four years later, but Miles Malleson’s 'Yours Unfaithfully' easily accomplishes that feat and more…It is a truthful, funny and touching play–a complex play about complex characters with great opposing facial and body language under Jonathan Bank’s subtle but clear direction." Full Review
"Given the witty dialogue and entertaining explorations of marriage, it’s surprising the play has never been produced...The performances are superb. Max von Essen is splendid as Stephen...The graceful Elisabeth Gray’s acting and facial expressions are particularly exquisite, trying to sort out her wavering emotions...There is no apparent reason to have two intermissions...While this may have made the evening longer than necessary, it was still a good night in the theatre." Full Review
"A charming and disarming comedy/drama...The brilliantly deft production of 'Yours Unfaithfully' is a welcome addition to the Mint archive. As is customary in a Mint production, sets and costumes have a panache as well. The scenic and costume design are admirable. The top-notch ensemble brings Malleson’s smart vision to life with an easy flair. It’s a tribute to all involved that one can’t peg 'Yours Unfaithfully' as drama, or drawing-room comedy; it stands on its own." Full Review
"Beautifully well written, thoughtful, intelligent play...The play is bracingly modern in its content and focus...The absence of full-on Brit accents was a disappointment to this audience member. Otherwise, this production is eminently satisfying in terms of Jonathan Bank's direction...All of the casting and performances are spot-on with the exception of Schnetzer, who seems a little too young, too easygoing, and yes, way too American." Full Review
See it if You would like to see the pros and cons of an open marriage demonstrated in a play. Your enjoy period clothing. This is set in 1933.
Don't see it if Your offended by open relationships. You get confused when you hear references to cricket and don't understand it.
See it if You enjoy period pieces that are beautifully acted, written and staged.
Don't see it if You don't like plays dealing with adultery or you only like shows based in the modern day.
See it if you enjoy plays about complex emotions within relationship (jealousy, love, communication, etc). It has some great emotional moments.
Don't see it if you want something fast-paced or edgy by today's standards. It centers around the emotions, rather than actions, of the characters.
See it if You enjoy Mint Theater productions. Always well done-great sets-interesting forgotten plays. Max Von Essen a treasure. Wonderful twist end.
Don't see it if You want today's language. If you want plays about kids on the edges of society this week s not that.
See it if you enjoy drawing room sort-of-comedy. Good acting and old-fashioned situations.
Don't see it if You like quick, witty comedy. It is sort of slow and certainly not Noel Coward. But all in all an OK evening.
See it if Interested in the topic of jealousy and romantic love. It reminded me of a Wallace Shawn play -- lots of conversation about a topic.
Don't see it if Topic not for children. And they would find it baffling and boring anyway!
See it if you are interested in the pros and cons of an open marriage.
Don't see it if you want a play with a lot of energy. This one is mostly people involved in an open marriage calmly discussing their feelings.
See it if you enjoy rarely seen plays from early-mid 20th century, curious about how older play would cover "open marriage," like intimate setting
Don't see it if older plays are not your cup of tea, you don't like thoughtful comedies or plays in which women learn to express themselves
See it if You like good dialogue about relationships. Loved costumes and acting. Relationships are fascinating. Open marriages are not easy.
Don't see it if You don't like British humor or privileged society.
See it if you'd enjoy an interesting premise - the search for happiness in open infidelity - examining the disconnect between our logic & emotions.
Don't see it if you'd be dissatisfied with a predictable destination for a journey that's not as satisfying in its trajectory as it could have been.
See it if You enjoy an old fashioned 3 act play that is relevant and satisfying, and will leave you with something to discuss.
Don't see it if You like action more than dialogue.
See it if you enjoy intelligent and well written plays about the challenges couples face in maintaining a loving marriage.
Don't see it if you are not interested in the various manifestations of love, jealousy and the need to be oneself.
See it if you appreciate discovering (via the Mint) decades old plays that can be astonishingly relevant
Don't see it if a play that doesn't label any character as '"guilty" disturbs you - but then why are you going to the theater at all?
See it if You like intelligent writing, good acting and beautiful sets and costumes.
Don't see it if You like shows that are fast-paced and have closure at the end.
See it if You want some thoughtful, profound, real life food for thought
Don't see it if You want showy, busy, jazz hands like song and dance. This is all play, and all good.
See it if you enjoy old fashioned shows which have intelligent plots, lines, and good acting. Had to keep reminding myself this took place in 1933.
Don't see it if Old fashioned shows are just not your thing. You need high drama and bad language to keep you interested.
Get alerts about your favorite artists and theater companies