See it if you are fascinated by lawyers. I found the arguments and strategies unconvincing. This is a punchline play which disappointed.
Don't see it if you want more than talking heads. The plot points didn't work, altho some class action talk was interesting (better done in A Civil Action).
See it if you like to see how the sausage is made-how high powered litigators operate behind closed doors
Don't see it if /since problem with script: out-of-the-blue revenge plot/motivation emerges at end; too many operatic/unrealistic speeches; uneven acting
See it if you like a very well written drama about an important environmental issue. Nice twist at the end.
Don't see it if you like a lavish production or don't like hearing lots of court terms. Read more
See it if you want to see an entertaining legal drama with tightly drawn characters, a fair amount of intrigue, and a realistic narrative.
Don't see it if you are averse to legal potboilers or you've overdosed on the countless TV legal dramas. This is a good play, but it's nothing terribly new.
See it if A legal case drama that's set in a high powered Manhattan law firm conference room. A relevant and realistic play is your choice.
Don't see it if You are looking for a light comedy or satire. The humor in this play is of the black variety ! Contemporary realism is not your thing.
See it if You like a serious, relevant, timely piece of theatre. Finally, a show that lives up to its title! It can get dense--have coffee before!
Don't see it if You don't like intellectual banter on stage or if you're looking for a fun show. This ain't it, but what it is--is much better!
See it if If you care about what is happening on our planet and how it affects us all. Timely and really makes one think.
Don't see it if If you want something totally funny.
See it if you like good plotting-thoughtful contemporary plays. Or if you're interested in the legal profession, the environment, and moral dilemmas.
Don't see it if you are offended by obscenities, uneven occasionally hyperbolic acting, blackmail, or the use of sexual favors to achieve an end.
"It's certainly a juicy situation, one that a more experienced playwright could invest with plenty of crackle, but Shabel and his director aren't, theatrically speaking, ready to graduate from moot court…The double-dealing and horse-trading is often surprisingly limp…Neither the writing nor the direction conveys a sense of the stakes involved…The play is pretty much like its characters: It comes on strong and tough, but, in the clutch, proves to be surprisingly weak and disorganized."
“Unlike such films as ‘Erin Brockovich’ and ‘A Civil Action’ which cover similar ground in
stories of ecological pollution, this play takes place exclusively in
executive conference rooms where the decisions are made. In the course of this
taut 90 minute drama directed by Christopher Scott, we experience loyalty,
integrity, greed, blackmail, betrayal and redemption. The cast of seven proves
expert at playing these legal and corporate types.”
"A behind-the-scenes look at how and why class-action suits can drag on for years…No faulting the seven-member cast. They do a good job of individualizing all these high-powered legal types…Unfortunately the playwright resorts to using some really hoary tricks to move his plot forward…The production values are pretty bare bones, but they work. What doesn't work is the play being consistently engaging as well as a worthy dramatization of a serious societal issue."
“In the end, however, in spite of Shabel’s sincere attempt, we care little about this story...The characters themselves are more iconic than specific...There are no real surprises as everything plays out...The connections leading up to the conclusion are never clearly established and the landing is bumpy in the extreme...This is a noble attempt to tell a smarmy tale. Shabel has the guts, and now he needs a dramaturge’s guidance to help him dig for the gold that is surely there.”
“Lawyers will appreciate the profanity-laced boardroom wrangling over huge payoffs, class actions vs. individual lawsuits, settlements vs. trials, and venal techniques...Shabel, wanting to make clear where his heart is...concludes with a melodramatic twist that taints the play's integrity…’A Class Act’ doesn't reach the heights of...Ibsen's ‘An Enemy of the People’ or the movie ‘Erin Brockovich’, but its examination of how lawyers operate entitles it to its day in court.”
"A boardroom drama that feels like ‘Erin Brockovich’ without the suspense or Julia Roberts…Though 'A Class Act' has a lot to offer, it plays like a law brief with the language stilted and long-winded, unless you are a lawyer. Even though the show is 100 minutes, it seems longer. We care about the unseen victims, not the characters onstage and that is never a good thing. Only the last 15 minutes really cut deep into the soul of the piece, but by then it just seems manipulated."
"The characters are of an ilk that gives lawyers a bad name...There are twists and turns in the plot—some believable, others not...Though the plot points are nothing new, they remain relevant, and raise significant questions about human motivations and corporate corruption...Director Christopher Scott holds our attention by keeping the actors moving around the stationary set and growing the tension between them, giving emphasis to their increasingly volatile confrontations."
“For all the bombast, though, we rarely hear what anyone feels. Lawyers jockey for position, but the dialogue isn't clever enough to make these verbal conflicts sizzle. Legal jargon drags; ethical quandaries get glossed over. The real issues, of environmental destruction and corporate profit at the expense of human beings, only crop up at the end of the story — way too late.”