"Sometimes moving, sometimes baggy play...'For Peter Pan' strikes me as stuck partway between theatrical worlds...Without external conflict, the interactions can seem shapeless, the pacing gelatinous. Making things worse is the unevenness of the performances...If you are aiming for lightness, a leaden, humorless staging will sink you. To fly, a work like 'For Peter Pan' needs a great deal more fairy dust than it gets here."
Read more
âWhat begins in gauzy dullnessâRuhl mandates that the first two parts âshould feel almost unperformed,â and they doâeventually gets hoisted on a clunky apparatus of symbolism about refusing to grow oldâŚThe finale trots out familiar stuff about the magic of theater, but no amount of fairy dust and clapping can reanimate a play that never seemed alive to begin with. Itâs a waste of the playwrightâs gifts, and the audienceâs time."
Read more
"What had happened between an inspired idea and a production that left me more frustrated than inspired?...It comes down to two things: design and politics...Ruhl revels in the world of fancy, but this productionâs visuals leave little to the imagination...The playâs engagement with politics feels preemptively dated...Ruhlâs play is standing right on the edge of something quite marvelous and mournful, but at times it feels just a little too afraid of its own shadow."
Read more
"Even the most skilled playwright would have trouble juggling these disparate stylistic elements of confessional monologue, homespun naturalism and fantasy, and despiteâor perhaps because ofâRuhl's personal connection to her material, the piece feels hopelessly strained...Chalfant, as always, is superb, mining her role for every bit of humor and emotion. The other members of the ensemble are equally fine...But the cast's efforts are not enough to lift this laborious work."
Read more
âRuhlâs story of J.M. Barrie's iconic characters gone to seed is the most moving aspect of 'For Peter Pan,' a play that ultimately gets stuck midway between banal family drama and a surrealistic meditation on agingâŚNo one in this ensemble of actors really captures the recognizable humanity, grief, and ultimate realization needed to translate Ruhl's ideas from stage to audience."
Read more
"After the father has passed on and an impromptu Irish wake is held, Ruhl's deft ear for dialogue is enough to hold our attention...But Ruhl badly overplays her hand in the jarring final sequence, in which Ann and the others find themselves inside a production of 'Peter Pan'...Compared to what has come before, it plays like bad sketch comedy...By making thuddingly explicit what has been clear all along, a gently touching meditation on mortality gets buried under a pile of self-indulgent shtick."
Read more
âIt's small talk, mostly, but it's lovelyâŚAnd the actors are all wonderful, led by Chalfant's contemplative yet drama-loving AnnâŚWe like this bunch, and we're glad to be with them. Until Ruhl goes somewhere elseâŚIt's a third act of sorts, a replaying of 'Peter Pan' heavy with Barrie dialogue, meant to evoke, the intermingling of our fantasy and real livesâŚWhatever it is, it feels tacked-onâŚWorth seeing, this latest Ruhl? Two-thirds of it, yes.â
Read more
âWhat this all means is something only Ms. Ruhl knows as the entire dramatic configuration of the play is baffling and sluggish at 90 minutes. We go from a drawn-out dying sequence to a typical brothers and sisters clash thatâs all adequately rendered at best. The rehash of J.M. Barrieâs characters is certainly whimsical but doesnât really parallel the lives of the characters and makes no real impact...There are some lovely moments in 'For Peter Pan' but as a whole itâs stillborn.â
Read more