Get alerts about your favorite artists and theater companies
"What suspense there is lies in waiting to see if Turner will respond to Gray’s plea and, more important, if the prisoner will in any way change the thinking of the other men. The answer to both turns out to be a qualified yes, and the ways in which Davis comes to these conclusions have a certain dialectic ingenuity. Mostly, though 'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' is a static work, as iconography tends to be. Sandberg-Zakian’s direction brings little kinetic energy or surprise to the proceedings." Full Review
"Davis’s way into the material is neither historical pageant nor postmodern abstraction; he and director Megan Sandberg-Zakian opt (almost quaintly) for poetic naturalism with theatrical flourishes...Such a stolid, talky approach puts the burden, unfortunately, on the acting. Brannon’s Turner has an unexpected sweetness that grows on you and makes his flashes of righteous rage all the more rattling. But Vickers, as Gray, is too callow to add nuance or depth to his scenes." Full Review
"The most interesting part of the creative exercise is not the activity inside Turner's cell, but the breadth of its implications about our relationship with history as a whole — whether 200 years past or flooding your Twitter feeds as we speak...The dialogue employed is filled with lovely prose and discerning metaphors. Though with little in the way of plot to prop up the dense language, and characters who seem immovable, the story can occasionally amble through the long night." Full Review
"Unfortunately, despite the incendiary nature of its subject matter, 'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' emerges as a tedious, lifeless affair...Brannon takes up some of the evening's slack with his fiercely commanding performance as Turner, but Vickers struggles in his two roles...'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' should have much more dramatic urgency than it does. Performed often in near-darkness, the sluggish play succeeds less in stirring emotions than lulling you to sleep." Full Review
"Playwrights have full license to tell their story the way they see it. Davis’s version is not all that convincing or all that compelling...Sandberg-Zakian keeps the story moving, yes; but one can wonder at her device of overloud rock/gospel music between scenes...Despite the potentially explosive subject matter, 'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' turns out to be non-compelling. Let it be added that this is a case where the program note is more intriguing than the play itself." Full Review
"This is a play in search of its conflict. The lightly anachronistic language sits heavily in the mouths of the actors...Davis has an interest in and a seeming reverence for history that doesn’t always serve him well. A playwright with a more distinctive approach to language and genre might have found surreal terror or brutal comedy in these events. But Davis’s version, under the stolid direction of Megan Sandberg-Zakian, is disappointingly static." Full Review
"Davis resists any singular reading, let alone an overtly political one. He prefers to let the tale remain as mysterious and open-ended as possible, and thus, in its way, more terrifying. Plays that try to walk that line usually trip, but Davis, who is 36 and whose work is largely new to New York, has smartly erected a sturdy scaffold around the material...The production, directed by Megan Sandberg-Zakian, has nerves of steel." Full Review
"Unfortunately, the experience of actually sitting through the 90 minutes of 'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' is not as rewarding as one would hope. I wondered about the point of many of the choices...Yet, for all its missteps, there is no denying the beguiling presence at the center of the play – that of Phillip James Brannon’s performance as a Nat Turner who is both uncommonly intelligent and otherworldly." Full Review
"Davis' current effort contains any number of gripping passages, but stumbles while trying to find a dramatic framework...The production is aided enormously by the performance of Phillip James Brannon...He doesn't make a single false step...But if Davis' words sing, his handling of dramatic structure still needs work...Time and again, the play works up an atmosphere of tension, only to let it dissipate. It's a stop-and-start approach that keeps us from becoming fully engaged." Full Review
“Turner’s story has particular resonance in our racially charged climate but I’m not certain Davis’s flat treatment does a lot to alter the dynamic. For all his suffering, it’s hard to sympathize with the messianic Turner, who ascribes his bloody actions to the word of God, not some deeply ingrained conviction invoked by slavery’s inhumanity, although he clearly propounds such beliefs. The chief reason to see the play is Brannon’s striking portrayal of Nat Turner." Full Review
"All this makes 'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' an affair that's as staid as it is well meaning, and as dull and dreary as it is portentous. When historical facts preclude traditional suspense, they need to be replaced with something to substitute for it...Also a problem is Megan Sandberg-Zakian's oppressively conceptual staging which tries to impart motion and energy on the swiftly flowing waterway of progress, but looks alternately suffocating and silly." Full Review
"Mr. Brannon as Turner is so underplayed we never feel his faith other than the words, his conflict or his struggle...Vickers is an interesting actor and I would like to see him in something else...Davis’s play is monotonous and boring though at times beautifully poetic. Megan Sandberg-Zakian, direction moves the set, but not the audience." Full Review
"The play raises the kind of enduring questions that are vital to the conversation needed around the issues of systematic racism and white privilege...Megan Sandberg-Zakian’s staging is effective and she utilizes Susan Zeeman Rogers’s stark set to simulate the various points of view extant in Mr. Davis’s matrix of moral ambiguity and treasure trove of rich and enduring questions...Nathan Alan Davis’s remarkable new play reveals that ultimately justice does not always prevail." Full Review
"We float between the horror of what is described, and understanding his rage and reason for vengeance. It’s a delicate balancing act that both writer and performer do a superb job with, although the direction doesn’t carry much forward movement...Through this play, which at times is a bit slow, erratic, and static, we are forced to see the connections of slavery and racism that have spanned generations in this country and invade our modern daily lives." Full Review
"'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' takes on the important 1831 slave revolt with the seriousness deserved by this legendary and famously brutal insurrection. Alas, the 90-minute hair-shirt of a drama by Nathan Alan Davis is didactic, preachy and airless in ways that seismic history must never be...Brannon never gets beyond the beatific martyr in director Megan Sandberg-Zakian’s production, staged on a runway with audiences on either side. Every so often the platform moves. The play does not." Full Review
"Davis’ play has an inventive but murky scenario that’s given an overwrought presentation and doesn’t ignite. It's only fitfully engrossing despite the efforts of those involved...Structured as a series of short scenes that are well written, the play cumulatively doesn’t hold interest...Brannon is compelling...Vickers is outstanding...If the production relied on this element it is possible that it would have been more satisfying. Instead there is a reliance on concepts and effects." Full Review
"Nathan Alan Davis' rather static play about the event centers on a detail of the rebellion...The play is essentially a dialogue between Turner (a powerful Phillip James Brannon) and Gray (Rowan Vickers), a more-or-less decent man...The evening, directed by Megan Sandberg-Zakian, keeps promising to climb to something more, but that never happens...It's a frail reed on which to hang a play about a watershed moment in pre-Civil War American history." Full Review
"More effective–and affecting–as a statement on how far we haven’t come in this country when it comes to race relations than as truly riveting drama, 'Nat Turner' is worth 90 minutes of your time...The best reason to see the work is to witness the galvanizing performance of Phillip James Brannon as Turner...While some of Davis’ writing is quite lovely, viewing 'Nat Turner' can also feel like watching Al Sharpton preach for 90 minutes: exhausting in both good and bad ways." Full Review
"Regardless of the embellishment or not, the interaction between Mr. Turner and Mr. Gray was at times mesmerizing and at other times preachy. What did stand out is that the conflicts that took place in the 1800's are not all that different from the conflicts and struggles today. The circumstances may be different but the roots remain the same...Set simple, lighting a bit spotty, theatre configuration innovative, thoughts of a repeat - scary." Full Review
"Davis' handling of this potentially galvanizing material is dramatically inert...He seems far more interested in overly theatrical, poetic monologues about faith, friendship and justice than he does about creating an actual conflict...Consider seeing it for Phillip James Brannon, who is very effective at conveying the depths of Turner's unshakable faith and searching nature." Full Review
"Appears as timely and topical...The play is a series of short, not particularly revelatory scenes...Most commendable is Brannon's ability to make words sound spiritually inspired even as they then suddenly ricochet off his targets like bolts of lightning. How they bounce off the more contemptuous personalities of both Gray and the guard is the most interesting aspect of the play...Davis's play is ultimately overly preachy and determinedly testy in its redundancies." Full Review
"If it all sounds monotonous, it is, but it also has redeeming features. Playwright Davis’s dialogue can be a little stilted, but it has a strong poetic spine. It’s rich with Biblical references and provocative images...And then there’s Brannon as the title character. Right from the start, when he’s talking to his chains, he’s fascinating...'Nat Turner in Jerusalem' gives life to a familiar but easily forgotten name from the history books, but it doesn’t coalesce into a satisfying drama." Full Review
"The sparse, persuasive two-hander examines America's racial history, but feels disturbingly close to the present day...Brannon's Turner is tough to look away from: fervent, fearless, and unconcerned with eliciting pity...Occasionally, the dialogue becomes repetitive: Davis parses every piece of subtext and symbolism, often explaining things he doesn't need to. The scenario he's placed onstage speaks eloquently enough to our national past, and to our present." Full Review
"Working with a small canvas Davis paints a portrait of a prophet of sorts...The duologues Davis has devised between Turner and his two visitors are engaging and often eloquent...Yet occasional moments ring false...Credibility aside, the production by Megan Sandberg-Zakian is deftly pared down and engaging, and Davis’s poetic language is given full weight." Full Review
"Playwright Nathan Alan Davis vacillates between lyricism and minimalism in the piercing two-hander 'Nat Turner in Jerusalem.' Centered on the last moments in the title character’s life after leading a slave rebellion, there are no easy answers here...Even the well-meaning white characters are brainwashed by racism, but still there are great moments that approach understanding and even kinship." Full Review
See it if you like shows that make you wonder what's actually going on, & leave you no less confused than when you arrived. Not much actually happens.
Don't see it if you're hoping to understand Nat Turner better. The dialogue goes on and on with very little of substance being communicated.
See it if you like theatre that makes you think, that challenges your preconceptions. Acting was superb. Direction was marvelous. Well staged.
Don't see it if you want a light hearted romp!
See it if you want to consider a generally forgotten event in American history, still relevant today, very well presented by the actors.
Don't see it if a discussion of American slavery might be boring.
See it if you want to see: exceptional acting by Phillip James Brannon; a window into one example why racial and ethnic suppression do not work.
Don't see it if historical stories do not interest you; you do not like talky plays with little action; you dread a story that you know will end in death.
See it if you love history. There are some good moments here. But the direction is incredibly clumsy and non-sensical including the techno sound.
Don't see it if you want to see a perfect show. This is a 3 character play but for some reason they have 1 actor playing two roles. This is ridiculous.
See it if you are interested in the history of race conflict and the futility of extreme action
Don't see it if you want better written theater that presents points of view with clarity and understanding
See it if The only thing that matters to you is seeing shows about Afro-American protagonists who may be heroic even though they slaughtered innocent
Don't see it if You value staging, script & a story that is not full of hero-worship.
See it if Two powerful performances fail to ignite the combustible events of iconic slave Nat Turner's life; sometime lyrical prose softens dullness
Don't see it if You lack patience & historical perspectives; often preachy narrative can grate
See it if You are interested in American history, and African-American history particularly.
Don't see it if If you don't like historical plays or are uncomfortable hearing about Nat Turner's rebellion, including several violent acts.
See it if you like preachy stories; like historical drama; like 2-handers that are 90 minutes;
Don't see it if you don't like slavery related stories; don't like historical plays; don't like to feel preached at; don't like uncomfortable subjects;
See it if a well-modulated, emotional, believable performance is a goal. Mr. Brannon scores a 90. The play-would rather read-extraordinarily topical.
Don't see it if you are not able to sit quietly while two characters debate. if you have difficulty listening to violence retold.
See it if you like slow agonizing drama while sitting on benches with low hard backs.
Don't see it if you hate deafening hip hop pre show and between scenes. Or if you find Bic candle lighters in 1830 problematic.