Already closed | 1h 45m | Financial

Red Hills

From 16 member  reviews
Members say: Great acting, Absorbing, Intense, Slow, Great staging

About the show

Inside 20,000 square feet of vacant downtown office space, the pioneering site-specific company En Garde Arts presents a transportive new work asking: who has the right to tell a story and why? More…

'Red Hills' invites audiences to travel from an NGO presentation by David Zosia, American author and self-proclaimed expert on Rwandan history, to the fields of Rwanda to meet God’s Blessing, a Rwandan Tour guide. Travel back to 1994 and experience these two men from vastly different cultures as they relive the events of their first meeting during the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda. A collaboration between similarly diverse playwrights, Ugandan Asiimwe Deborah Kawe and American Sean Christopher Lewis, 'Red Hills' invites you to bear witness as two men face long-buried memories, confront ghosts of their pasts, and question who owns history.

Member Reviews (16)


Great acting, Absorbing, Intense, Slow, Great staging
Avg Score

Ambitious, Absorbing

See it if You enjoy inventive and immersive theatre (even if it is a little underdeveloped)

Don't see it if You don't want to stand. You want something polished.

Banal, Obvious

See it if You don't mind being beaten over the head with a hackneyed story. It is hard to believe someone agreed to be identified as a dramaturge.

Don't see it if Obvious is a problem for you. Please, give the hero a bad habit, and give us any reason to not hate the stupid, evil white guy.

Absorbing, Great acting, Great staging, Intense, Intelligent

See it if You enjoy shows with audience immersion/interaction. You want to see a piece of theatre that will make you research the subject matter.

Don't see it if You very much dislike any sort of audience participation. You feel you would not be able to sit on a wooden bench for a while.

Also "I Love You, I'm Sorry, Forgive Me, Thank You."... Read more Read less

Absorbing, Great acting, Relevant, Intense

See it if You’re interested in the white savior narrative/how Americans exploit developing countries’ tragedies for profit

Don't see it if You can’t handle intense theater, deals with heavy trauma

Masterful, Intelligent, Profound, Resonant, Riveting

See it if You want an absorbing theatrical production covering an important period of recent history, deeply moving and powerful

Don't see it if You want a traditional play, or if the subject matter would be an issue, but it’s a topic that needs to be addressed (uncomfy seats)

Great acting, Great staging, Slow, Thought-provoking

See it if you like an unusual setting and a small cast; interested in the topic of two men's experience in Rwanda

Don't see it if you have trouble sitting on a bench for a long period of time; your mind wanders during slow performances

Absorbing, Great acting, Resonant, Slow, Ambitious

See it if immersive and interactive theatre is a plus. great use of space, scenic design, and music/foley.

Don't see it if u don't like participation or want to be seated for the whole time. Don't like well-meaning whiteness being challenged.

Great acting, Great staging, Intense, Thought-provoking

See it if you want to understand the genocide in Rwanda in the context of a victim and his family.

Don't see it if You don't want heavy themed shows of a disturbing subject matter.

Absorbing, Intelligent, Relevant, Intense, Thought-provoking

See it if You want a different kind of theatre experience - and a subject matter that is heartbreaking and gives one great pause to think

Don't see it if You are uninterested in the Rwandan genocide and do not have a certain patience for storytelling.

Also An extremely creative space to witness this story in and we are very c... Read more Read less

Slow, Disappointing, Ambitious, Banal

See it if you are interested in an exploration of forgiveness (or lack thereof) and stories/who should be telling them

Don't see it if you're not comfortable with some audience participation, you want proper seats, you want a lot of plot/action

Banal, Cliched, Ambitious, Slow, Disappointing

See it if You want to be disappointed. Site-specific shows when done right are powerfully immersive, this feels forced at best and grueling at worst.

Don't see it if You want to see a thoughtful examination of how genocide affects a nation.

Absorbing, Clever, Great acting, Great staging

See it if You enjoy immersive theater and are willing to walk from one room into another. Also if you enjoy political theater.

Don't see it if You do not like any of the above

Great staging, Great acting, Resonant

See it if you enjoy immersive theatre; are interested in hearing about the Rwandan genocide

Don't see it if you have trouble standing for extended periods of time; sitting on a hard wooden bench for the majority of the show sounds unbearable

Great acting, Intelligent, Thought-provoking, Slow, Intense

See it if Rwanda and its history interests you, you like site-specific, immersive staging

Don't see it if You don't like to stand or sit in uncomfortable chairs or 90 minutes. A two person play doesn't do much for you.

Absorbing, Entertaining, Great acting, Great staging

See it if Enjoy an immersive theater going experience

Don't see it if You dont like standing for potentially extended periods and exposure to dark themes is troubling to you

Insipid, Intense, Overrated, Slow, Ambitious

See it if You want to sit in a sauna for 3 hours listening to two people complain.

Don't see it if You expect to have a great customer experience. The space does not accommodate a good theater-going experience.

June 13th, 2018
“A clever, site-responsive play...An intelligent work of theater and ultimately a reassuring one...What Ms. Pearl’s canny direction and the evocative design can only somewhat disguise is the conventional structure of the piece...The problem isn’t that this is a hopeful ending, but that it’s an en...
read more
June 16th, 2018
“A reworking of Lewis’ solo memory play ‘Dogs of Rwanda’...Kawe maintains Lewis’ basic plot but alters the conception for two characters...Lacks a compelling spine and earlier presentational additions don’t really add much...Never becomes very compelling...Writing is slack, rudimentary and persis...
read more
June 14th, 2018
"An honest conversation, full of laughter and heartache, between unlikely companions in misery. The seamless collaboration of two authors elevates the monologue of a privileged white man and returns the voice to those whose story it is in the first place...Ssenjovu’s performance is lively and for...
read more

Related content