Get alerts about your favorite artists and theater companies
"[The actors] seem to be having just as good a time as Mr. Rapp apparently had writing and directing this tall and bloated tale of nasty doings on the banks of a cannibalistic river...It is easy to imagine 'Wolf' as a collaboration between Tennessee Williams and Erskine Caldwell, both deep in their cups...The artery-clogging prose is enlivened by the vivacious staging...The cast members will be very much in your midst throughout, sharing their glee at the chance to act up a hillbilly storm." Full Review
"Rapp presents a handful of scenes that are among his very best, alongside an assortment of seriously confounding characters and plot contrivances that don't add up to much...The actors bring a fierce intensity to their roles, like sticks of dynamite that have just been lit...'Wolf in the River' ends up feeling more like an overstuffed, undercooked stew of atrocities...That's not to say it's entirely a loss. Amid the gratuitousness is a collection of moments that rank as top-tier Rapp." Full Review
"Though 'Wolf' has trouble sustaining its fever-dream intensity, there's no doubt that Rapp can write...Rapp clearly loves horror, but this attempt to import the style onto the stage doesn't quite work. A few of the flaws are in execution: As a director, Rapp creates inventive environmental staging, but he urges his actors into loud performances rather than frightening ones. Even the dialogue, Rapp's strong suit, turns against him at times." Full Review
"A wildly overstaged and mostly incoherent tale...Nothing much happens in 'Wolf,' which fades from one scene of depravity to the next....'Wolf in the River' is a would-be shocker undone by its sheer oversupply of grim and grimy details. Even for playwright Adam Rapp, who revels in the details of various bodily fluids, this one is a bit much. Acting as his own director, Rapp seemingly has no one to point out the moment when his taste for the horrible descends into shtick." Full Review
"‘Wolf in the River’ is a theatrical grotesquerie that allows Rapp to give his fevered imagination free rein; much of it is godawful self-indulgent and overwritten, some of it is moderately interesting, and a small portion is actually quite fascinating...But however much Adam Rapp’s ‘Wolf’ huffs and puffs, it serves as a marvelous springboard for several exceptional performances, most especially that of Kate Thulin, who makes her every unrealistic moment thrillingly real." Full Review
"The actors are, for the most part, the resident company called The Bats. They are in high form with Rapp’s work, brave, daring and utterly terrifying. There is a intensity that makes you wonder if this show will turn real and bring you into its midst...Rapp, who also directs, keeps this production alarmingly honest. Despite what is good about this play, the play in a strange way goes nowhere and we never really get to know these characters." Full Review
"From the start, there is an instant element of discomfort...'Wolf in the River' is unlike anything you’ve ever seen. It will catch your breath and keep you on edge...There were troublesome components to the text but when you’re thrust in a space such as this, the elements will get the better of you and sway the experience into something extraordinary. It’s when you have more time to think about the play that you’ll really start to question 'Wolf in the River.' For good and for bad." Full Review
"Under Mr. Rapp’s extraordinary direction, the ensemble cast of 'The Wolf in the River' brings the audience to a level of awareness and responsibility the theatre too often buries under the veneer of entertainment and the umbilical cord of numbness. Adam Rapp’s 'The Wolf in the River' is nothing like you have ever seen before and nothing you are likely ever to see again." Full Review
"The play, which has alternate endings, is told out of chronological order so that it makes it difficult to follow...While the audience may be confused, the cast appears to be gleefully enjoying their roles...'Wolf in the River' is more like a 1960’s happening with its non-linear plot line, colorful characters, startling imagery, gratuitous violence, weird goings-on, and use of myth and folk tale. It will not be to all tastes." Full Review
"Magnificently acted, beautifully written, and claustrophobically staged in the round, with a pile of dirt in the center and the cast running and slinking in circles behind the audience, it’s a jolt of dark energy...It grabs spectators in an exceptionally visceral and creepy way, without messy performance-art tricks...Rapp’s text and direction draw out the best from the talented cast...I wasn’t sure what was real and what was fantasy or dream. Yet the story held me from start to finish." Full Review
"By constantly shifting storytelling styles the aggregate impact of this yarn gets diluted. However, there are vivid performances and haunting moments that will still grab you...The silliness of the pre-show makes it quite hard to take the show seriously, and some goodwill is lost while you try to re-commit to the actual endeavor at hand. But once the play gets going and we get a grip on our surroundings, Rapp’s kinetic writing and intense poetry flourishes." Full Review
"'Wolf in the River' teeters between fantastic and overwrought...For those who like their theater to challenge them with ideas and images as much as story...'Wolf in the River' has a few problems inherent in the play. The portrayal of these people may be meant as impressionistic, but it borders on vicious stereotyping of them as dumb-ass Southern hicks...The staging has the audience in the mist of the actors, which is mesmerizing." Full Review
"Always provocative, often poetic, playwright-director Adam Rapp blends the mythic with the mundane in this potent exploration of the tribulations of coming of age in the wild backwaters of rural America...'Wolf in the River' offers an entrancingly primal approach to theatrical storytelling...There are times when Rapp’s dithyrambic dialogue seems be trying too hard...The Bats leap into their roles with their customary zeal, clearly trusting Rapp’s vision." Full Review
"At times the constancy of the shouting and the breathless vocabulary of the dialogue can be exhausting. The quietude of this single river scene is something to cherish...The fact that there is such a gentle relationship around which all of this menace occurs only raises the tension. There is an immediacy to the impressionistic appeal of 'Wolf in the River,' but its ideas about the way human beings can instantaneously relate to each other grant it a more permanent universality." Full Review
"Rapp and the cast make bold choices and commit to them, but the challenge is having these choices payoff. The vulgarity in some of the scenes can create distance for theatergoers...At the same time there is so much depth to these characters that each of them could have their own play written about them...The violence, nudity and sexual situations do effectively show the characters’ vulnerability, desperation and fears–even when theatergoers have already seen enough." Full Review
"Even at the end of the 105 minutes worth of love, loud noises and a twerking sequence with a blown up Miley Cyrus doll, the purpose of the production remains unknown... Rapp’s 'Wolf in the River' is almost like an aged old wine; it is an acquired taste...The play makes you feel an abundance of emotions, ranging from pity for delicate Tana, to terror in the presence of the wolves. But it, somehow, is unable to give you closure or help you unravel meaning and purpose." Full Review
See it if It's Adam Rapp so you know at the very worst it will be amazing. Great set and staged perfect in the round. you felt like you were in it.
Don't see it if you want to be challenged and asked to think.
See it if You enjoy productions off the beaten path, and are open to non-narrative pieces.
Don't see it if You want a compelling experimental theater experience beyond a few moments of "Oh that's clever."
See it if Rapp's vision of self-destructive white trash in the South is disquieting. Vivid storytelling through violence and outrageous imagery.
Don't see it if Jack Ellis is totally riveting and charismatic. He gives life to Rapp's histrionics. Another shirtless hardbody e.g. Ben Walker, Alex Breaux
See it if You come to Adam Rapp for the strange, unexpected, bizarre (and who doesn't) don't mind the offensive and know the Bats might do anything
Don't see it if You need more than just strange, as the thought provoking, dare I say insightful he sometimes brings to the stage.
See it if you like being shaken-up by intense scenes acted brilliantly in an intimate setting that offers no barrier between stage and audience
Don't see it if you want a romantic comedy, are on a first date, or are averse to nudity and violence
See it if You'd enjoy a sophisticated wild disturbing journey which may (or not depending on audience chance) end well. Ambitious & creatively staged.
Don't see it if The ugly, course, sexually threatening isn't something you want to experience-or if you simply prefer your plays to have a clear narrative.
See it if You enjoy dark humor and a thoughtful musing about life and the future of our society. My friends and I talked about it for several days
Don't see it if You are claustrophobic or squeamish. The actors are in and around the audience, and the story has a good deal of gore and nudity
See it if You want to see the best goddamn portrayal of someone on a skiff by an actor who's on solid ground.
Don't see it if You want a play that offers anything worthwhile as far as story or message.
See it if Adam Rapp's writing is amazing in this. It's thought-provoking and disturbing and involving and violent. Perfect if you want to be shaken up
Don't see it if You need linear story-telling or the mundane or are disturbed by sex or blood. Not for everyone- compelling if you are willing to be changed
See it if You enjoy sitting through meaningless, ridiculous performance art. You just have to see EVERYTHING ! There is no other reason to see this !
Don't see it if You hate pretentious, badly written and meaningless performance art. You want to keep your good opinion of Adam Rapp.
See it if you're into dark, theatrical storytelling that pushes you out of your comfort zone. (Great show, but I wished I wasn't on the front row.)
Don't see it if you're squeamish gritty, in-your-face theatre with violence and nudity. Rapp seems to be actively trying to make the audience uncomfortable.
See it if you like admirably physical theatre, [hanging from ropes, wallowing in mud, nudity] & don't mind a circuitous journey
Don't see it if you don't like wallowing in mud, actors hanging over your head on ropes, nudity & a very circuitous journey
See it if You received a comp ticket. You know someone in the company.You want a cookie & fun w/balloons: your reward for sitting through this mess.
Don't see it if You have anything better to do w/your time.You value good storytelling or performance. Just don't see it-not worth your time or money.
See it if You wonder what Mercury Fur would have been like without a plot. There is some decent lighting which is the only positive.
Don't see it if You want something that makes the slightest bit of sense or if audience participation makes you want to die.
See it if you find joy in trying to decipher confusing theater; you have the desire to see everything open in NYC right now
Don't see it if you want a story that makes sense; you don't like indulgent and dark pieces
See it if your favorite niece or nephew is in it and you don't mind seeing them naked, covered in dirt and stage blood; you are a masochist.
Don't see it if you like worthwhile theater; you value your time...
See it if You don't mind having no understanding of a show. The acting, staging, & poetry are compelling. I have PhD in Lit and I was confused.
Don't see it if You mind having no idea of what is going on in the show you are watching,
See it if You have friends/family in the cast, and even then, you might want to come up with a credible-sounding excuse to avoid this utter disaster.
Don't see it if You're looking to save 105 minutes of your life and $23, which would be better spent on a mediocre meal at a fast-casual restaurant.