See it if It examined the way in which it’s impossible to take action and comment on that action at the same time.It explored nested metaphor,history.
Don't see it if Disconcerting at first to be jerked in and out of the action. Horrific confrontation with how Now parallels some of worst times in history.
See it if you can suspend the need to understand what is going on and why. Interesting premise but too much going on. Good enough acting
Don't see it if you need or want resolution to a plot line. The things that make it interesting are ultimately the things that are confusing and frustrating
See it if you are interested in exploring the notions of "truth," albeit in an unnecessarily complex structure that loses some of the impact.
Don't see it if multi-layered plot structures (esp in a 90 min show) put you off. Worth noting that a 90 min show probably shouldn't feel long...
See it if you relate to watching a dated movie plus the director’s commentary & discussing the circumstances under which the movie was made
Don't see it if uninterested in the complicated cultural baggage we bring in interpreting/judging foreign cultures or our own past Read more
See it if You like puzzles.
Don't see it if You have trouble with enigmatic writing.
See it if u have the patience to follow a story-within-a-story-within-a-story that's part historical fiction, part mystery, part apocalyptic fantasy.
Don't see it if you like your storytelling clear & concise; you're not looking for anything too cerebral, narrative-heavy, long-winded & meta. Read more
See it if you want to see something new and different.
Don't see it if you must know about the world the play takes place in or you don't like story-within-story shows. Read more
See it if A very cerebral play that grapples with ideas of what is real and what memory is. Solid, intelligent acting by a good cast.
Don't see it if You don't like non-liner plays that brings up more questions than answers.
“Dahlquist’s provocative and remarkably layered new play...With three story lines sprawling over two continents and more than a century, it considers the power of storytelling — whether in art or in calculated lies — to shape and bend people’s perceptions of what’s real...An excellent cast...Kudtarkar beautifully handles the tonal shifts from one reality to another, but the scenes set in a grim future Brooklyn...feel unnecessary. They’re also drab in comparison to the rest.”
Read more
"The story lines are related and tucked inside each other but really serve to comment on philosophies and moralities...The metaphorically dense dialogue emerges early on...The mishmash of interlocking stories continue from 1922 events to the movie shoot to the cast speaking directly to the audience...Dahlquist's play is long-winded and the director (Aneesha Kudtarkar) was not able to help us understand why this particular story was being told."
Read more
“’Three different narrative lines, none of them with a compelling situation or characters...It isn't clear if the director has encouraged her cast to give stilted, bad-movie performances, but if so, she has succeeded magnificently. The line readings are wooden and heavy with insinuation...Exactly what this tripartite tale means to say is left obscure...A complex dramatic construction, but it is uninhabited by recognizable characters or comprehensible ideas.”
Read more
"Gordon Dahlquist's '[Veil Widow Conspiracy]' is a challenging work-cerebral, complicated, extravagant in language and scope. Some people may find it affected, and it does seem at times to revel in its own complexity. (Also, what's with those brackets in the title?) '[VWC]''s ambition is sometimes reminiscent of Tom Stoppard's work, and there are certain touches of Stoppardian humor in the writing. (Don't, though, expect an uncontrollable attack of guffaws.)"
Read more
“An ambitious play...Dahlquist's winking irony often engages. But the play can also be tiringly heavy on exposition without exposing what it's all really about...The storytelling...feels far more knotty than it needs to be...’[Veil Widow Conspiracy]’ sets off the most sparks in the too-rare moments when the connections between timelines emerge clearly...Ultimately, however, it's not entirely clear what story we're supposed to walk away thinking about.”
Read more
"Confusing, verbally inflated, cerebral, and emotionally uninvolving; it's also well-acted and has enough substance to suggest the play it might have been…The play dabbles in issues of truth and lies, reality and illusion or fantasy… Further befuddling the overwritten play are the frequent intrusions of characters speaking direct address monologues, either pseudo-poetic or prolix, academic statements couched in an odd mixture of the prosaic and the theoretical."
Read more
"Intriguingly intricate but ultimately not entirely satisfying, the script is trying to do something really difficult...It’s never easy to create a play of ideas and also yoke them to characters and a story that propels itself forward. Harder still, of course, when you’re trying to serve three stories at once, in the service of one set of ideas. As the second half of the play picks up steam, it almost all comes together, but the film narrative still weighs down the piece."
Read more
“The work is ambitious, dense, and multi-layered, with each member of the cast playing two or three roles in a meta-theatrical narrative that moves back and forth... As a result of the intricate inter-weavings of the plot, it is often confusing to follow...The slow-paced script could benefit from some tightening...[Veil Widow Conspiracy], though in need of some clarification and editing, does offer an intriguing exploration of the thin and ever-changing line between fact and fiction."
Read more